Brown v. Wagner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*314Opinion
COAKLEY, J.
Basically this appeal is from that portion of a judgment denying admission to probate of three pages written in longhand by the decedent. In the interest of brevity and clarity these pages will be referred to as “the codicil.”
The respondents filed a contest in which they objected to the admission of the codicil to probate. They took the position that the will of July 31, 1961, alone, should be admitted. Ann Wagner, appellant herein and a respondent in the will contest, answered, alleging the validity of the codicil and praying its admission to probate.
The contest filed by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970