Legal Opinion

City of Saginaw v. Michigan Law Enforcement Union, Teamsters Local 129

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1984No. Docket 69705PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, City of Saginaw, and defendant, Michigan Law Enforcement Union, Teamsters Local 129, are parties to a collective-bargaining agreement. Defendant is the exclusive bargaining representative for all full-time, sworn police officers (excluding the chief of police, captains, lieutenants, and sergeants) employed by plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals as of right from a court order confirming an arbitration award which granted defendant’s grievance and held plaintiff in violation of the parties’ collective-bargaining agreement by requiring bargaining-unit members to forfeit one paid workday each…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rooney v. Town of YarmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Gogebic Medical Care Facility v. AFSCME Local 992Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. City of Lincoln Park v. Lincoln Park Police Officers Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hayman Co. v. Brady Mechanical, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Moss v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API