Legal Opinion

Erskine v. Markham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 23, 1909No. 7382PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before DeVore, J., Oconee, Action by Mary Ann Erskine against George Edgar Markham et al. From order permitting complaint amended, defendants appeal. cites: 80 S. C., 319; 81 S. C., 579; 83 S. C., 1; 53 S. C., 315.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee Justice Jones.

This action was commenced originally for the purpose of having reformed a deed of land executed by William W. Erskine, deceased, on January 30, 1906, to Mary Ann Erskine, his wife, and Sarah E. Erskine, his daughter, and to his eight grandchildren, the children of Ella Markham, his deceased daughter, for a sale of the land, and division of the proceeds among the parties in interest according to the real intention of the grantor.

Sarah E. Erskine and the eight children of Ella Markham were made defendants, and answered, claiming…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mallard Lumber Co. v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Ellis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. KyzerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. Loretto Literary & Benevolent Society v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API