Legal Opinion

Keefer v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 1, 2023No. 4:21-cv-07503Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SALNAVE KEEFER, Case No. 21-cv-07503-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 22 10 RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 22. The 14 Court gave the parties leave to brief a motion for summary judgment “limited to the question of 15 whether the disclosure(s) in the form(s) produced to the individual named plaintiff comply with 16 the relevant statutes.” Dkt. No. 17. The motion has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Daniel Walker v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API