Hill v. State

BRICKEÑ, Presiding Judge.

On the former appeal in this same case, 27 Ala.App. 573, 176 So. 805, this court put the trial court to error in giving the affirmative charge for the State, holding, as we did, that under the conflicting evidence the trial court was without authority to direct a verdict either for the State or for the defendant. The cause was accordingly reversed and remanded; and this appeal is from a judgment of conviction upon the second trial.

So far as we are able to ascertain, the facts adduced upon the second trial were practically the same as those appearing upon the first…