Legal Opinion

R. Bruce Montgomery v. Eaton Peabody, LLP

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 29, 2016No. Docket Cum-15-192PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] R. Bruce Montgomery and Wanda Haddock (collectively, Montgomery) appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (1) granting Judy A.S. Metcalf and William V. Ferdinand Jr.’s (collectively, the Eaton Peabody attorneys) motion to dismiss multiple counts of Montgomery’s complaint for legal malpractice, and (2) denying Montgomery’s motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] In 1960, Montgomery’s parents purchased seven shorefront lots of land in Georgetown, numbered thirty-seven through forty-three on a 1935 subdivision plan recorded in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Efstathiou v. Aspinquid, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Ramsey v. Baxter Title Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Drinkwater v. Patten Realty Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Robert M.A. Nadeau v. Lynnann FrydrychSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  5. Bangor Motor Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paul v. Town of LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  2. Adam P. Paul v. Town of LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API