Culp v. Webster
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
Plaintiff obtained in this action a judgment against defendant, which remains unsatisfied. On proceedings supplementary to execution an order was made directing the defendant to deposit with the marshal of the municipal court the sum of $300 “to abide the further proceedings in this case”. This the defendant did, and thereupon he pre sented to the marshal a claim that this money was exempt from execution, and also addressed to the court a motion for an order establishing it as exempt. The court made an order granting this motion, from which plaintiff has taken the present appeal.
In support of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lawrence v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Barton v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Schmuckli's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- In re the Estate of McCormickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- State Department of Public Welfare v. National Bank of CommerceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.