Legal Opinion

State v. Mangiaracina.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 21, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mangiaracina, Johnnie Cuezze and Pat Porella appeal from a conviction of grand larceny. They present the issue: Is an information, in one count, charging that on a day certain appellants "did then and there unlawfully and feloniously steal, take and carry away" an "automobile" of the value of $500, the property of Wm. T. Brueck, and "fifty-four fur coats" of the value of $300, the property of Rubins Furs, Inc., a corporation, "of the aggregate value of" $3500 duplicitous?

Brueck was a salesman and his automobile contained fur coats of Rubins Furs, Inc., his employer, at the time of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ShulsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Lorton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. State v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. State v. ListonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BradleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. State v. RidingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State v. HarperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. State v. CoorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API