Parker v. Nicholas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellee is engaged in cattle tick eradication work in Howard County, pursuant to the regulations of the Board of Control of the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, having charge thereof. The validity of the regulations of this hoard has been recognized in numerous cases. Appellee sprayed three head of cattle belonging to appellant, two one day and the third the following day, and he demanded the fees for the service amounting to $9, $3 for each animal sprayed. When payment was refused, appellee drove away the last animal sprayed, for the purpose of selling it in satisfaction of his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Cazort v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Boyer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.