Legal Opinion

Norng v. Shalala

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided March 3, 1995No. C94-4054PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1202ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING THE CASE TO THE SECRETARY FOR FURTHER REVIEW

BENNETT, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION 1202

A. Factual background 1202

B. The court’s jurisdictional basis 1207

C. Procedural background 1208

II. ANALYSIS 1208

A. The “substantial evidence” standard 1208

B. The Polaski standard and subjective pain credibility determinations 1209

C. Relative burdens' of proof 1210

1. The ALJ’s analysis of Norng’s subjective pain complaints 1210

a. Alleged inconsistencies regarding cooking and shopping 1211

b. Alleged discrepancies regarding Norng’s motivation to work 1214

c.…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kinsella v. KinsellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. State of Tennessee v. Justin EllisTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Natural Resources Defense Council v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  4. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. MebtahiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API