Bandana Trading Co., Inc. v. Quality Infusion Care, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Jurors are routinely admonished not to form or express an opinion on the case until it is finally submitted to them. However, jurors often form opinions, hopefully tentative, concerning the credibility of witnesses as they are listening to them. This is a natural response consistent with processing information. With such a tentative opinion in mind, a juror should not demonstrably agree with a statement of law argued by counsel premised upon the credibility of a witness. Depending on how aggravated such conduct may be, it may rise to the level of prejudicial misconduct. Here,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. HollowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CallesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Norholm v. Cirovic CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Sherwood v. Vogele CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Silbermann v. Shangri-La Construction CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020