Legal Opinion

Alfred Q. Campbell, III v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 24, 2019No. 3597-17LUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2019-127

UNITED STATES TAX COURT ALFRED Q. CAMPBELL, III, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 3597-17L. Filed September 24, 2019. Alfred Q. Campbell III, pro se. Martha Jane Weber and William Walter Kiessling, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION LAUBER, Judge: In this collection due process (CDP) case petitioner seeks review pursuant to section 6330(d)1 of the determination by the Internal Revenue 1 All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Goza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  3. Sego v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  4. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API