Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Runyan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1934No. 329PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By KUNKLE, J.

The case has been submitted to us upon the record taken in the lower court together with the briefs of counsel.

We have considered this record and also the briefs of counsel with care.

It is admitted that plaintiff was injured in the usual course of his employment with French and Hecht Company, Incorporated.

Counsel for plaintiff in error insist with much force that there is no evidence in the record to sustain the finding that the plaintiff suffered an injury accidental in its nature and origin. Counsel for plaintiff in error insist that the record shows that the plaintiff’s…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Esmonde v. Lima Locomotive Works, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API