Diblasi v. Pa. R. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
In 1942, when the minor plaintiff, seven and one-half years old, was injured, Washington Avenue, between Fourth and Fifth streets, in Philadelphia, was 1001 feet wide. Each side had a sidewalk or foot-way 18 feet wide, leaving 64 feet between curbs. Along each curb was a strip 22 feet wide, paved and improved for vehicular traffic; the remaining, or central strip 20 feet wide was occupied by defendant's railroad consisting of two sets of standard gauge tracks with the usual dummy between them. The tracks of heavy rail were set on ties in ballast; the dummy and the spaces between rails were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Erie & North-East RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
- Brobston v. Darby BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Reading v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Borough v. Chambersburg & Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Jones v. Erie & Wyoming V. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Wyoming County1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HAMLEY v. PITTSBURGH RWYS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Conry v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Hamley v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Magerko v. West Penn Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950