Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Harris

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1980No. 46710, 46712, 46713PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The petitioners are confined in or conditionally released from state mental hospitals having been committed under RCW 10.77, providing procedures for treatment of the criminally insane. They had been charged with felonious crimes against property and had been acquitted by reason of insanity. It is their contention here that their crimes constituted "less serious" felonies, within the meaning of certain language found in the case of Alter v. Morris, 85 Wn.2d 414, 536 P.2d 630 (1975). As a consequence, they maintain, they should not have been prosecuted but rather should have been proceeded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allison v. PattersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Alter v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Neil F. Lampson Equipment Rental & Sales, Inc. v. West Pasco Water System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. FramptonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. David Lee Hickey v. Charles MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Application of DowningIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API