Legal Opinion
Haussmann v. Wolf
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered December 16, 1991, granting plaintiffs’ motion to renew and, upon renewal, granting plaintiffs’ mo*372tion to amend the bill of particulars, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the motion to renew denied.
Six years after the commencement of this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs moved to amend their bill of particulars to assert a claim for failure to prescribe proper medications. The original bill, served almost six years before, and amended bill, served over two and one-half…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Klein v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Prince v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Katechis v. Our Lady of Mercy Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Excelsior 57th Corp. v. Excel AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Sullivan v. HarnischAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.