Legal Opinion

Vesta Insurance Company v. Amoco Production Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1993No. 92-7340PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

In this Texas diversity case, the district court held, in its declaratory judgment from which Plaintiff-Appellant Vesta Insurance Company appeals, that (1) the subrogation clause in the Vesta policy of insurance does not apply to allocation of benefits between Defendant-Appellee Amoco Production Company and its insurers, and (2) Vesta owed Amoco attorneys’ fees for its defense of a personal injury suit by Rudolfo Gonzales for the injuries he sustained in an accident at Amoco’s facility. Disagreeing with the district court’s interpretation of the contractual provisions as…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  4. Peavey Co. v. M/V ANPACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. International Insurance Co. v. Medical-Professional Building of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lafarge Corp. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Co. of America v. National Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Cone Mills Corp. v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Westchester Fire Insurance v. Heddington InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
  5. In Re AndrewsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API