Legal Opinion

Freeholders of Passaic v. Slater

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

This action was brought by the freeholders of 'Passaic against the county clerk to recover fees received by him in naturalization cases under the act of congress. The county claims them under the act of 1906. Comp. Stat., p. 4643. The construction of both statutes is involved. As far as concerns the act of congress, the case is controlled by a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court. Mulcreevy v. San Francisco, decided January 5th, 1914. This decision, however, does not control the construction of our state statute. That is for us…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Inhabitants of the County of Hampden v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Board of Chosen Freeholders v. KaiserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. State v. Judges of Inferior Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. County of Passaic v. ManlyPassaic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API