Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1975No. 13072Published

1DissentJustice Haswell

(dissenting) :

I dissent. In my view supervisory control should be denied for two reasons: (1) A declaratory judgment is proper under the pleadings; (2) a declaratory judgment is proper under-relator’s unpleaded contentions.

The only pleading before the district court was the complaint for declaratory judgment. It alleges an oral compromise settlement agreement of a pending- lawsuit, the terms thereof, relator’s claim of misunderstanding or mistake in entering into the agreement, and an existing controversy by reason thereof. It seeks a declaratory judgment determining the rights and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. FreeMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Montana Deaconess Hospital v. Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. City of Townsend v. D. A. Davidson, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API