Tinnin v. First United Bank of Miss.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is the second time this case is on appeal to this Court from the Chancery Court of Lauderdale County, Robert H. Oswald presiding. The first time we heard this case we found that Allan Hobgood's will which set up a racially discriminatory charitable trust was illegal. Because that will had no residuary clause in the event the trust should fail, we reconstructed it by adding an ultimate residuary clause which would allow the Tinnins to take as heirs at law. We then found the reconstructed will ambiguous and reversed and remanded for a new trial to determine the least offensive alternatives…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Tinnin v. First United Bank of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Morris v. Lansdell's Frame Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Magee v. McNeilMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
- Stovall v. StovallMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Ferrara v. WaltersMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality v. WeemsMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of Estate of MasonMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Dew v. LangfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Merchants & Planters Bank v. WilliamsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.