Legal Opinion

Triangle Farms, Inc. v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 7, 1933No. 31575Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

LAND, Justice.

In our original opinion the court said: “We have read the record carefully and concur in the finding of the trial judge that the Sherburne Industries, Inc., had no written contract of agency from the plaintiff to sell the land involved in this suit. Some parol testimony was introduced to show a verbal authorization to do so, but parol testimony cannot be received to establish an agency to sell land. R. C. C. art. 2992; Mumford v. McKinney, 21 La. Ann. 547. This testimony was doubtless admitted to prove that the plaintiff consented to, participated in, ratified or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mumford v. McKinneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API