Legal Opinion
Abrams v. Textile Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.
Motions numbered 60, 62 and 63 are consolidated. All issues herein were referred to the referee to hear and determine. Thereby were transmitted to the referee all the powers, duties, and obligations of the court in respect of the matter referred. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 469, 470; Morange v. Meigs, 54 N. Y. 207; Schuyler v. Smith, 51 N. Y. 309; Albany *26Brass & Iron Co. v. Hoffman, 30 App. Div. 76.) It is the referee’s duty to sign the judgment. (Snell v. Snell, 177 Misc. 923; cf. Himmelstein v. Himmelstein, 186 Misc. 964.) And it is incumbent on the referee to exercise his discretion in the award…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schuyler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Osborn v. . CardezaNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Nassau Bank v. . Nat. Bank of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Maicas v. . LeonyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Snell v. SnellNew York Supreme Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hampton Bays Supply Co. v. AdlerNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970