Legal Opinion

McCauley v. Vandina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 12, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated January 14, 2004, as, upon renewal, granted the motion of the defendant Esta A. Goldman, and the separate motion of the defendants Melvin Brill and Leonard Brill, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and denied, as academic,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Mariaca-Olmos v. MizrhyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Leal v. WolffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Scotti v. BoutureiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. McDowall v. AbreuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bernier v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API