Frank B. Wilder & Associates v. St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. We first consider the primary controversy involved in the appeals, which is whether it was error to order these appellants to be sucked into the vortex of this litigation some two and a half years after its commencement. Ordinarily such a time span would seem to be excessive, especially since a considerable amount of testimony had been presented to the auditor. But is this overall time span properly to be considered in deciding the question?
Norair, the original defendant, impleaded Abreu and Robeson under the provisions of Code Ann. § 81A-114 (a). It could not make the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jenkins v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Holland-America Line v. United Co-Operatives, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Leonard Bros. Trucking Co. v. Crymes Transports, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norair Engineering Corp. v. Saint Joseph's Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Norair Engineering Corp. v. Saint Joseph's Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Norair Engineering Corp. v. Erickson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Frank B. Wilder & Associates v. St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974