Bennett v. Bennett
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
The appeal, on motion of appellee, was dismissed, because the “ decision ” or judgment in the case was regarded as one having “ grown out of a matter connected with a decedent’s estate,” as provided in R. S. 1881, sections 2454 to 2457, both inclusive. Upon the motion to reinstate the case, appellant’s counsel contend, ven1- earnestly, that the case does not come within these sections, and that hence appellant had a year within which to appeal, as in ordinary cases under the code.
Appellee commenced this proceeding below by filing what is styled a complaint for a writ of mandate against…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rusk v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- Koons v. MellettIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Vail v. PageIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Galentine v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Harrison National Bank v. CulbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.