Legal Opinion
Baglini v. Pullman, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-406, 75-407 and 75-1216PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
These cases involve an alleged conflict of interest on the part of plaintiffs’ attorney. They came before the court on a defense motion to disqualify him and to dismiss the suits because of the representation by plaintiffs’ counsel of a potentially adverse party at the time of the incident from which the actions arose. Following a hearing and after consideration of counsels’ briefs, I concluded that no prejudice had resulted or would result to either the plaintiffs or defendants from the continued participation of plaintiffs’ present attorney, and accordingly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Melamed v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Global Van Lines, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Nemours Foundation v. Gilbane, Aetna, Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.