Janesick v. Osbon
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, C. J.
The bill of complaint herein was filed to compel specific performance of a land contract. The court dismissed the bill on motion and affidavits on the grounds (1) that plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law; (2) that plaintiff’s assignor (therefore, the plaintiff) could not be the rightful purchaser of the land in question; and (3) to prevent a multiplicity of suits. The grounds for dismissal urged by defendants are for defects claimed to appear on the face of the bill. Court Rule No. 18 (1933). The only question for decision is whether the bill of complaint affirmatively sets up sufficient…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brin v. MichalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Freeman v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Janiszewski v. ShankMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Lewis J. Selznick Enterprises v. Harry I. Garson ProductionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Murphy v. RiggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.