Legal Opinion

Hodierne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 2014No. 2D13-3995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACK, Judge.

David Hodierne challenges his judgment and sentence for home invasion robbery with a deadly weapon while wearing a mask. We affirm the judgment without comment. However, because Hodierne was denied the opportunity to give his full statement to the court before he was sentenced, we reverse his sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing.

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(b) provides that the sentencing court “shall entertain submissions and evidence by the parties that are relevant to the sentence.” The language of the rule is mandatory, Culbertson v. State, 306 So.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ventura v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Culbertson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Davenport v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Goldberg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. JESSICA SERNA v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. RICHARD CARL GOUDREAU v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Stanley Tyron Harris v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  4. Valdimir Morrobel v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  5. Valdimir Morrobel v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API