Legal Opinion

Pinnock v. Whyte

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 2016No. 3D15-1042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagoa, J.

Xernona Pinnock (“Pinnock”) appeals from a final judgment of paternity, paternal responsibility, parenting plan, time-sharing schedule and child support (“Final Judgment”). 1

Because Pinnock’s due process rights were violated by the trial court expanding the scope of the scheduled hearing without notice, we reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellee, Warren Whyte (“Whyte”), filed a Petition for the Determination of Paternity. Pinnock filed an answer to the petition. The trial court referred the parties to mediation, and the parties reached a partial mediated settlement agreement. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shah v. ShahDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Robertson v. BretthauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Harbus v. HarbusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Pullis v. PullisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cardelle v. HSBC Bank USA, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. KAREN ERREN v. EDUARDO MARINDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API