Legal Opinion
Finch v. Conrail
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 3, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover for work-related injuries sustained by David Finch (plaintiff), an employee of third-party defendant, Warner Cable Company (Warner). Prior to his accident, plaintiff was using" an aerial bucket truck to transfer cable lines from existing utility poles to new poles that were jointly owned by defendants New York Telephone Company (New York Telephone) and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (Niagara Mohawk). Plaintiff lowered the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MATTER OF PETERS v. New York City Hous. Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- O'Kane v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Bennion v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- DePuy v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Basile v. ICF Kaiser Engineers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bond v. York Hunter Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Perrini v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kaleta v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007