Travelers' Insurance v. Pomerantz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Levy, J.:
Plaintiff seeks a rescission of the life insurance policy issued to the defendant Morris Pomerantz for the reason that the latter made certain misrepresentations of fact in his application for such insurance which were of a material nature. The policy, plaintiff asserts, was issued not only in consideration of the payment of the premium but upon the truth of the representations written into the application and that since the latter is part of the contract (Ins. Law, § 58) any statements therein contained, if untrue and material, are sufficient to warrant a rescission, thus vitiating…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dilleber v. . Home Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Holmes v. Phenix Ins. Co. of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Ira S. Bushey & Sons v. American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walker v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Clinton v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- Lowe's of Roanoke, Inc. v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Sumpter v. National Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. BuntJustice Court of Town of Rhinebeck · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.