Burkard v. Midvale Estates, Inc.
Nassau County District Court
1Opinion of the CourtRaymond L. Wilkes, J.
This is an action by a real estate broker to recover a commission in an nnconsummated real estate transaction wherein the plaintiff’s brokerage agreement with the defendant vendor (delivered to the plaintiff contemporaneously with the proposed contract of sale) remained unex*404eeuted, although the contract of sale itself was fully executed but did not consummate in a title closing.
The taking of testimony was preceded by counsel for the contending parties entering into the following stipulation of facts: 1. Plaintiff was a broker duly licensed. 2. Pláintiff was the procuring cause of bringing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Selzer v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Barnes v. RobertsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1859
- Corning v. CalvertNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.