Legal Opinion

Burkard v. Midvale Estates, Inc.

Nassau County District Court

Decided June 10, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtRaymond L. Wilkes, J.

This is an action by a real estate broker to recover a commission in an nnconsummated real estate transaction wherein the plaintiff’s brokerage agreement with the defendant vendor (delivered to the plaintiff contemporaneously with the proposed contract of sale) remained unex*404eeuted, although the contract of sale itself was fully executed but did not consummate in a title closing.

The taking of testimony was preceded by counsel for the contending parties entering into the following stipulation of facts: 1. Plaintiff was a broker duly licensed. 2. Pláintiff was the procuring cause of bringing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Selzer v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Barnes v. RobertsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1859
  5. Corning v. CalvertNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API