Legal Opinion

James M. Rankin Shirley Rankin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1998No. 97-70334PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

As the Tax Code has long acknowledged, the timing of income recognition is a difficult, complicated problem. Rather than exhaustively list when every possible kind of income must be recognized, the Tax Code instead gives taxpayers some latitude in timing their income recognition. Subject to several restrictions, taxpayers may choose a method of accounting that allocates different income to different time periods.

With this latitude, however, come many risks, and one is that when a taxpayer changes his method of accounting, some of his income may be taxed twice or not at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Graff Chevrolet Company v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Schuster's Express, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  4. Vukasovich, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Vukasovich, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Copy Data, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Suzy's Zoo (R) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, P.C. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  3. Capital One Financial Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. Mingo v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. Cargill, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API