Legal Opinion

Browning v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1987No. 14800PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This is an action for postconviction relief under Rule 27.26. Movant (defendant) Floyd Edman Browning was charged with three counts of rape in violation of § 566.-030, RSMo Supp.1984, and two counts of first-degree sexual assault in violation of § 566.040, RSMo 1978. The defendant pleaded guilty to all five counts.

After addressing the defendant personally in open court as required by Rule 24.-02(b) and (c) and having determined there was a factual basis for the pleas as required by Rule 24.02(e), the trial court accepted defendant’s pleas of guilty and imposed sentence as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bannister v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Pool v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Oerly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. W_F. WMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WiseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. McGuirk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API