People v. Treadwell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal, after a joint trial, from judgments convicting them of burglary in the third degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and petit larceny, defendants contend that the evidence is legally insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they constructively possessed burglar’s tools. We disagree. We conclude that the evidence in this wholly circumstantial evidence case, viewed in the light most favorable to the People, excludes to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis but that of guilt and is inconsistent with innocence (see, People…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ShabazzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Larrabee v. BartlettDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- People v. GloverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. McFaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.