In Re Hansen

I concur with the holding of the majority opinion but add these comments.

This Court since 1960, as noted infra, has at times emphasized as a standard of review concerning the Bar’s findings and recommendations that they should be adopted unless they are arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, or not supported by substantial *808evidence (or other similar language).1 At other times, however, this Court has emphasized that the recommendations made by the Bar are not . . to be in the same category . . . ” as findings of fact . . because it is our responsibility to discipline an erring attorney, and we…