Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 8, 1968Published

1Dissent

MILLIKEN, PALMORE and STEINFELD, JJ.,

dissent on the ground that in their opinion the question of whether the movement and proximity of the passing vehicle suddenly created an apparent emergency was properly submitted to the jury. Cf. Brown v. Todd, Ky., 425 S.W.2d 737 (1968).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968