Sickles v. Manhattan Gas-Light Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the special term denying defendant’s motion to dissolve a temporary injunction and continuing the same during the pendency of the action.
1Opinion of the CourtDwight, J.
— I think this order should be affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons so well stated in the opinion of the learned judge at special term. That statement, I think, fully justifies the exercise of the discretion of the court to con*305tinue the injunction till the trial of the issue of fact joined in the action. It may, however, be added to the very impartial statement of facts contained in the opinion below that the proof of an overcharge for gas is not confined, as urged by counsel for the appellant, to inference from a comparison of the amounts charged to the plaintiff during different…
2Cited by2 opinions
- People ex rel. McGrath v. Green Island Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
- Weber v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1903