Legal Opinion

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VOSE

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 2017No. 115,424PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, C.J.:

¶ 1 The essential question before this Court is whether the district court erred by ordering the administrator of a decedent’s estate to timely prepare and file a federal estate tax return for purposes of electing portability of the decedent’s Deceased Spousal Unused Exclusion Amount (DSUE), pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 2010, for the benefit of the decedent’s surviving spouse. We hold that it did not.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 This cause arises from a dispute concerning the estate of Anne S. Vose (Decedent). Decedent died intestate on January 22, 2016. Appellee C.A. Vose, Jr.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. KNOX v. OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
  4. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
  5. DUKE v. DUKESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API