Legal Opinion
Neset v. Rudman
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1956No. 7563PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
The plaintiffs brought this action on October 27, 1954, to determine adverse claims to the Southwest Quarter of Section 19, Township 157, Range 94 in Mountrail County. The only named defendant was M. B. Rudman. Upon motion of Rudman, George Neset was added as a second party defendant.
The complaint is substantially in statutory form. Section 32-1704, NDRC 1943. The defendant Rudman answered denying generally the allegations of the complaint.. By way of a fuilher defense and counterclaim, he alleged that on the tenth of August 1949 he purchased and,secured an oil and gas lease…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Dixon v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Dever v. CornwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Henry S. Grinde Corporation v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Larson v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Estate of Helen M. Johnson, Deceased, Lolita McNeill Muhm, Independent v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Sorenson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Alfson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.