Guzze v. New Britain General Hospital
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs1 instituted this malpractice action against the defendants for failure properly to diagnose and treat the named plaintiffs breast cancer. From two summary judgments rendered in favor of the defendant physician, Joseph Welna,2 the plaintiff has appealed. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred (1) in granting the motion in limine precluding an expert witness, and (2) in granting the summary judgments.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The action against the defendants was commenced by complaint dated August 12, 1985. The defendant filed interrogatories…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Davis v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Davis v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Girard v. WeissConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Bourquin v. MelsungenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Sullivan v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.