Legal Opinion

Michael Gootee and Marlene Gootee v. Colt Industries, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1983No. 80-1091PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Michael and Marlene Gootee, appeal from a judgment of no cause of action entered in favor of the defendant-appellee, Colt Industries, in this diversity action alleging negligence, breach of warranty and misrepresentation in the design and sale of the Colt .45 automatic. The district court directed a verdict in favor of Colt on the misrepresentation claim and submitted the case to the jury on a “breach of warranty of design” theory. The jury found that Colt had not breached such a warranty and the judgment of “no cause of action” was…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Robert v. McDonald v. Union Camp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Grantham and Mann, Inc., D/B/A Grantham Safety Industries, Inc. v. American Safety Products, Inc., Sam Evans, Richard J. Althoff and James HunnekeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. James D. Arms v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Allen v. Minnstar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API