Legal Opinion
Roseboro v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*525Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula J. Omansky, J), entered August 6, 2003, which, upon remand for a new trial as to CPLR article 16 apportionment only between defendant New York City Transit Authority and the nonparty tortfeasors of a prior jury damage award of $500,000 for noneconomic loss, apportioned liability for such award 80% against defendant and 20% against the nonparty tortfeasors, unanimously modified, on the facts, and the matter remanded for a new trial on apportionment only, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements, unless, within 30 days of service of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chianese v. MeierNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Brewster v. Prince Apartments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Pantages v. L.G. Airport Hotel Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Roseboro v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nash v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Stevens v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Cintron v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Cintron v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Margaret Betts v. Sixty Lower East Side, LLC, Sixty Hotels, LLC, and Sixty Hotel Manager, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.