Legal Opinion

Neeley v. Maurer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1948No. 30521PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

— Plaintiffs instituted this action to clear title to, and fix the boundary line of, real property owned by them. The complaint described the property by metes and bounds and as the vacated portion of the replat of Port Orchard City; that plaintiffs, at the time of acquiring the property, September 25, 1925, replaced a certain fence on the southern portion of the property, and since that time have been in open, notorious, and hostile possession of the property enclosed by the fence. It was further alleged that the defendants, since sometime in 1944, have interfered with the fence by removing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Campbell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Weidlich v. Independent Asphalt Paving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Yarrow Land Co. v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Stokes v. CurtisWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Rinehold v. RenneWashington Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API