Huschke v. Arcadia Orchards Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Pendergast, J., entered December 28, 1914, sustaining an objection to thé admission of evidence, dismissing an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.
Appeal from a judgment of dismissal based upon the insufficiency of the complaint. The complaint recited, that, in March 1909, respondent sold to one Grant two hundred acres of land, together with a perpetual water right to the use of certain water for irrigation purposes during the period from May 15 to September 1 of each year, from canals, ditches, flumes or pipe lines to be constructed by respondent, which would deliver the water at the highest point of the granted land; that the grantee subsequently sold twenty acres of this land to appellant, together with a proportionate share of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wetmore v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Ara v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Weller v. Missouri Lumber & Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Hanes v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Norton v. KullAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parsons Trading Co. v. DohanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Nicaraguan Long Leaf Pine Lumber Co., Inc. v. Moody. The William G. OsmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Huschke v. Arcadia Orchards Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919