Legal Opinion · Dissent

TranSouth Financial Corp. v. Sharon (In Re Sharon)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1999No. BAP 98-8034Published

1Dissent

STOSBERG,

dissenting.

The panel’s automatic turnover approach sanctions a procedure used to bludgeon creditors by employing the petition as a device to recover a repossessed vehicle without a hearing. A debtor can then dismiss the petition by simply not filing a plan, which is not required for 15 days after the case is filed. This procedure does not preserve the status quo — it alters the rights of the parties without the opportunity for a hearing. The panel’s strained interpretation of the statutes suggests that “rights” in the property belong to the debtor. Any rights to property lawfully…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In the Matter of Thomas J. Perkins, Jr., Debtor-Appellant, and Appeal of Teachers' Retirement System of the State of Illinois, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. In Re BriggsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  4. In Re YoungDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  5. Troy Industrial Catering Service v. State, Department of Treasury, Revenue Division (In Re Troy Industrial Catering Service)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API