Legal Opinion
Barocio v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided October 2, 2003No. 14-01-00944-CRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
117 S.W.3d 19 (2003)
Xavier Hernandez BAROCIO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 14-01-00944-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).
June 19, 2003.
Rehearing Overruled October 2, 2003.
Norman J. Silverman, Houston, for appellant.
Eric Kugler, Houston, for appellee.
Panel consists of Justices EDELMAN, SEYMORE, and GUZMAN.
PLURALITY OPINION
CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.
Following the denial of his motion to suppress, appellant Xavier Hernandez Barocio pleaded no contest to possession of marijuana. He contends on appeal that the trial court should have suppressed the marijuana…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.