Legal Opinion

In re Hudson & Manhattan Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 25, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is an application by certain tort claimants for priority status in the administration of the. estate of the Debtor.

■ The 91 claims consist of 81 which arose, before the filing of the petition, including 28 employee claims and 53 non-employee or so-called public claims. The remaining 10 claims arose during the interim period, i. e., after the filing of the petition but before the appointment of a receiver. These interim claims include 5 employee claims and 5 public claims,.

• Due notice of a hearing was given and briefs were submitted by several parties. Argument was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. St. Louis Trust Co. v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. Pitcairn v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Veatch v. American Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of I. J. Knight Realty Corp., Bankrupt. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. In re I. J. Knight Realty Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Augus v. StichmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. Augus v. StichmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. In the Matter of I. J. Knight Realty Corp., Bankrupt. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API