Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Cameron
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 2013No. Docket 34,210PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Justice.
{1} Petitioners are retired teachers, professors and other public education employees (collectively, Retirees) who seek a writ of mandamus against the New Mexico Education Retirement Board (ERB), which administers their retirement plan under the Educational Retirement Act (ERA). See NMSA 1978, § 22-11-6 (2011) (describing the powers and duties ofthe ERB); see also NMSA 1978, §§ 22-11-11 to -15 (2011) (describing the educational retirement fund). Retirees seek to compel the ERB to pay them an annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) to their retirement benefits,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harry H. Zucker v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Pierce v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Montoya v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Maine Ass'n of Retirees v. Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- Premier Trust of Nevada, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
- Bartlett v. CameronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Citizens for Fair Rates & the Env’t v. NMPRCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2022
- State ex rel. Franchini v. Toulouse OliverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2022