Legal Opinion

In re the Bond Issuance of the Greater Wenatchee Regional Events Center Public Facilities District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2012No. 86552-3PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

¶1 Our state constitution limits municipal indebtedness to protect taxpayers from legislative and voter improvidence. We must decide whether the city of Wenatchee (City) would exceed its debt limit by entering into a “contingent loan agreement” (CLA) with appellant Greater Wenatchee Regional Events Center Public Facilities District (District) to help the District finance a regional events center. The District argues that the CLA is not subject to the City’s debt limit because it creates a “contingent” liability, triggered only if the District is unable to make payments on the District’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M.J. Brouillette v. T. Wolf, GovernorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Farmers Bank & Trust v. Homestead Community DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API